Employee productivity improvement is a critical challenge for CEOs aiming to enhance business performance.
This article outlines actionable steps to address productivity barriers systematically. It is to be read in continuation with the previous article on ‘Organizational Climate: Managing Business Performance’. By leveraging employee feedback and HR productivity tools, organizations can implement strategies to improve employee performance and achieve sustainable growth.
The approach below is based on experience and suggests launching corporate initiatives based on employee feedback. It also proposes continuation of this exercise for 3 – 4 years, since all the factors responsible for low employee productivity may be difficult to address in one go. We shall look at this problem in 5 phases for ease of implementation.
Phase 1: Problem Diagnostics through employee participation
Methodology
To kick-start the employee productivity improvement journey, gather insights directly from employees using a strategic feedback form during the Performance Appraisal Process.
1. Clarify Anonymity: Inform the employee that their responses shall not be routed through the manager.
2. Analyze Data: Collate and analyze feedback to uncover key trends.
3. Share Insights: Share the findings directly directly with the management to design actionable strategies.
This process not only engages employees but also equips leaders with the insights needed to address barriers to productivity. Moreover, to ensure full participation, every employee must sign off on the form before initiating the appraisal process. Consequently, this step guarantees 100% employee participation in this strategic survey, creating a foundation for future HR strategies and effective performance tracking.
Key Questions
Which 3 factors impact your productivity the most?
In the column RANK, enter 1 for a FACTOR which is 50% or more responsible; 2 for the factor which is 30 to 50% responsible and 3 for the factor which is less than 30% responsible for your low productivity.
Note: RANK column is to be left blank for the remaining four factors not applicable to you.
SRL NO. | FACTOR (responsible for my low productivity) | RANK |
1 | My job skills are inadequate and require upgrading. | |
2 | My Goals/ KRAs have not been clearly defined. | |
3 | My manager is professionally incompetent and unable to guide me properly. | |
4 | Business objectives of the organization are not clear to me. | |
5 | My personal/ family problems distract my attention from the work. | |
6 | Tools/ facilities provided at my work station are outdated. (specify in the last column the tools/ facilities that need review). | |
7 | I have seldom received appreciation for any of my achievements. |
What actions can management take to support you?
Provide three actionable suggestions for each ranked factor. For the factors ranked 1, 2 & 3 above, suggest three specific actions the management may take to help in enhancing your productivity.
FACTOR RANK | SUGGESTED ACTION 1 | SUGGESTED ACTION 2 | SUGGESTED ACTION 3 |
What should be the corporate planning focus during the next two years?
Rank activities such as skill reviews, goal setting, or performance-linked incentives by priority. as 1 to 6. Rank 1 means ‘highest priority’ and Rank 6 means ‘lowest priority’.
Note: No two activities can have the same rank.
ACTIVITY | RANK |
Clearly define the Goals to be achieved by each department. | |
Review the skill requirements for all job positions in the company. | |
Identify low performers and steps needed to boost their performance | |
Focus on marketing & sales for revenue growth. | |
Launch self-learning initiatives for employees in different departments & track employee participation. | |
Introduce performance linked incentives in the company |
Phase 2: Set and Track Goals Using Software Tools
A crucial aspect of productivity enhancement is goal accountability. Hence, implement goal-setting software that enables managers and employees to define, track, and evaluate SMART goals.
Features of the Software
- Software should enable recording of:
(i) Goal statement
(ii) Current status of goal in terms of targets previously achieved
(iii) Expected targets to be achieved in a specific time frame
(iv) Tracking achievement at 3 to 4 intermediate points
(v) Record mentoring notes of the manager at each point (maybe as a video/ audio clip) and
(vi) Final achievement - The manager should be able to send an email at any time, requesting the employee to update the current status of any goal. Additionally, this acts as a special feature of ‘tracking.’
- The software should be able to provide the management:
(i) Information about the number of employee-manager interactions in each quarter
(ii) Goals for which the progress is slow
(iii) Goals that have been over-achieved etc. This would thus enable each functional/ department head to know the real story & intervene before it is too late.
This transparency therefore enhances workplace productivity by fostering accountability and enabling department heads to intervene promptly when progress stalls.
Phase 3: Use 360-degree feedback for leadership evaluation
Employee feedback often highlights managerial inefficiencies as a major obstacle to productivity improvement. Hence, if “incompetent management” ranks among the top three barriers in Phase 1 feedback, initiate 360-degree reviews in the next appraisal cycle.
Objectives
- Identify Gaps: Pinpoint ineffective managers & decide on their training, transfer, development or separation from the company.
- Develop Leadership: Collect development needs for each manager & plan training for those skills/ competencies that are deficient in most of the cases.
- Track Progress: HR productivity tools to monitor participation in self-development programs and organized training sessions. (Check if Q 3 of Phase 1 supports this activity)
A Training Management Tool should enable tracking of employee participation in the ‘self-development programs’. Furthermore, by prioritizing leadership development, organizations can enhance employee performance and foster a positive organizational climate.
Phase 4: Recognize High Performers and Address Non-Performance
With long-term performance data available, management can identify non-performers. They can moreover explore exit strategies while implementing incentives to retain high-performing employees.
Actionable Steps
- Design performance-linked incentives to motivate and reward top contributors.
- Use data analytics to identify patterns of underperformance and plan interventions.
These initiatives align with broader productivity improvement goals and thereby ensure resource optimization across the organization.
Phase 5: Continuously Refine the Process for Employee Productivity Improvement
Improving employee productivity is an ongoing effort that demands a systematic and participative approach. Repeating Phase 1, by introducing a new Questionnaire every year, provides the management with a tool to decide on new initiatives in consultation with employees. This in turn keeps the focus on employee productivity improvement.
Conclusion
Organizations can tackle workplace challenges and enhance business performance by focusing on employee productivity improvement. Moreover, in the next article in this ‘Managing Business Performance’ series, our focus will be on Leadership Development and it’s role on improving the organizational climate.
Stay tuned for more actionable insights to drive productivity enhancement and business growth!
Liked what you read? Let’s take it to the next level!
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. | What are the key factors affecting employee productivity? |
Ans. | Employee productivity can be influenced by several factors. These include clearly defined goals, adequate job skills, efficient management support, access to updated tools and facilities, and also a motivating work environment. Thus, addressing these factors through targeted strategies can significantly enhance productivity levels across the organization. |
Q2. | Can employee feedback improve productivity? |
Ans. | 360-degree feedback provides insights from multiple sources—peers, subordinates, and superiors—on a manager’s performance. Furthermore, this feedback helps identify strengths and areas for improvement, enabling management to make informed decisions about training, development, or restructuring. Consequently, effective managers play a crucial role in guiding employees toward productivity goals. |
Q3. | What role does goal-setting software play in improving employee performance? |
Ans. | Goal-setting software enables clear communication of objectives. It also tracks progress and enhances accountability. In addition, employees and managers can set SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goals, track achievements, and receive continuous feedback. Hence, this process helps align employee efforts with company goals and ensures consistent progress. |
Q4. | How can 360-degree feedback improve managerial effectiveness? |
Ans. | 360-degree feedback provides insights from multiple sources—peers, subordinates, and superiors—on a manager’s performance. Furthermore, this feedback helps identify strengths and areas for improvement, enabling management to make informed decisions about training, development, or restructuring. Consequntly, effective managers play a crucial role in guiding employees toward productivity goals. |
Q5. | Do performance-based incentives retain top talent? |
Ans. | Yes, performance-based incentives play a key role in retaining top talent. By rewarding employee achievements, they not only motivate high performers but also boost their morale. As a result, they foster a productivity-focused culture, which helps retain valuable talent. Ultimately this contributes to enhanced business growth and sustained employee productivity improvement |